Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 · as amended by (EU) 2026/1744

EU AI Act deadlines.

The EU AI Act applies in phases. Part of it already applies, and the most demanding part, high risk, arrives on 2 December 2027 after the delay introduced by the Digital Omnibus.

— days until the high-risk rules

Timeline

What applies now and what is coming.

    Each date's status is worked out from today's date on your device.

    Education

    What it means for an educational institution.

    In force since 2 Feb 2025

    Emotion recognition in educational institutions is prohibited

    Systems that infer the emotions of students or staff in educational institutions are a prohibited practice (Art. 5), except for medical or safety reasons.

    In force since 2 Feb 2025

    AI literacy for staff

    Anyone using AI must take measures to support the AI literacy of their staff (Art. 4). Since the Omnibus, a specific level does not have to be guaranteed, but you do need to be able to show what you have done.

    What training it requires →

    In force since 2 Aug 2026

    Transparency

    People must be told when they are talking to an AI, for example a chatbot for families, and generated or manipulated content that is published must be labelled (Art. 50).

    Technical marking of that content is the tool provider's obligation, not the institution's. Tools already on the market before 2 August 2026 have until 2 December 2026: it is worth asking the provider to confirm it.

    From 2 Dec 2027

    High risk in education (Annex III, point 3)

    It covers education and vocational training at every level: schools, vocational colleges and universities. High-risk AI is AI used for:

    • Deciding access or admission, or assigning students to schools.
    • Assessing learning outcomes, including to steer the learning process.
    • Determining the appropriate level of education for a person.
    • Monitoring and detecting prohibited behaviour during exams.

    Those using them will have to follow the provider's instructions, assign competent human oversight, monitor how they work, keep logs and inform the people affected (Art. 26). A private body providing a public service may also have to assess the impact on fundamental rights (Art. 27).

    Companies

    And in a company.

    From 2 Dec 2027

    Employment and people management

    Using AI to select or filter candidates, decide promotions or dismissals, allocate tasks or evaluate performance is high-risk. Staff must be informed before it is used.

    From 2 Dec 2027

    Credit and insurance

    Assessing people's creditworthiness or pricing life and health insurance is also high-risk, except for fraud detection.

    Training · Art. 4

    What training it requires, and what it doesn't.

    The AI Act's only general training duty is AI literacy. It does not prescribe a course, a number of hours or a certificate: it asks for proportionate measures and the ability to show them.

    “Providers and deployers of AI systems shall take measures to support the development of AI literacy of their staff and other persons dealing with the operation and use of AI systems on their behalf, taking into account their technical knowledge, experience, education and training and the context the AI systems are to be used in, and considering the persons or groups of persons on whom the AI systems are to be used. This obligation does not require providers or deployers to guarantee any specific level of AI literacy of any individual.”

    Art. 4(1) · as worded by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, in force since 27 Jul 2026

    In force since 2 Feb 2025

    Who it applies to

    Every organisation that uses AI in a professional capacity, with no exemption by size. It covers staff and anyone using AI on the organisation's behalf, such as contractors or partners.

    Measures are tailored to what each person already knows, how they use AI and who it is used on. In schools and vocational colleges, that includes students under 18.

    What it does not require

    No guaranteed level, no certificate

    • No specific level has to be guaranteed for any individual.
    • Staff knowledge does not have to be measured.
    • No certificate is required: an internal record of training and other measures is enough.
    • There is no official syllabus or number of hours.

    Commission guidance

    What to cover

    • What AI is and which AI the organisation uses.
    • The organisation's role: whether it develops AI or uses other people's.
    • The risks of each tool, such as made-up answers.
    • Different training for different roles and contexts of use.

    Asking staff to read the instructions for use is usually not enough.

    Supervised since 2 Aug 2026

    How to show it

    National market surveillance authorities have supervised Art. 4 since August 2026. It is worth recording which measure was taken, for whom, when and for which tool.

    Art. 4 has no fine of its own in the AI Act. Penalties depend on each Member State, and in Spain the law that was to set them has lapsed (see below).

    From 2 Dec 2027

    Stricter for high risk

    Anyone using a high-risk system, for example to assess students, must assign human oversight to people with the necessary competence, training and authority (Art. 26(2)). Here the point is to prepare specific people for that system.

    Data protection

    The DPO's role

    The GDPR does not require an AI course, but the data protection officer's tasks include awareness-raising and training of staff involved in processing (Art. 39(1)(b)). When an AI tool processes student data, the two kinds of training overlap.

    Practical guide for educational institutions, with a record template

    ALEROM AI does not certify compliance with Art. 4: that responsibility stays with each organisation. It helps you know who uses each tool, assign each role the training it needs as a task with an owner, and keep the evidence. Coming soon, ALEROM AI will also offer the training: video tutorials by role. See the training.

    Penalties

    The cost of not complying.

    €35M or 7%

    Prohibited practices.

    €15M or 3%

    Breaching other obligations, such as high-risk or transparency rules.

    €7.5M or 1%

    Giving incorrect or misleading information to the authorities.

    Whichever is higher of the amount and the percentage of worldwide turnover applies; for SMEs, start-ups and small mid-caps, whichever is lower (Art. 99).

    Spain

    The Spanish law, still pending.

    The draft Organic Law on the good use and governance of artificial intelligence (121/000096), approved by the Council of Ministers on 26 May 2026, lapsed on 6 October 2026 when the Cortes were dissolved. The general election is on 29 November 2026 and the new chambers convene on 23 December 2026: the next government will have to table it again.

    The draft designated surveillance authorities, with AESIA as the single point of contact, and set the Spanish penalty regime. Until there is a law, the EU AI Act still applies directly, on its own timeline.

    With ALEROM AI

    Every obligation, with its answer.

    What the AI Act requiresWhat ALEROM AI does
    Knowing what AI is used and whyAn inventory of AI tools and uses, with a record of provider, data and terms.
    Avoiding prohibited practicesA rule that flags as a priority any use that tries to detect emotions at school or at work.
    Identifying high riskEach use classified with readable rules, with Annex III uses flagged.
    Human oversightSensitive uses reach a responsible person ready to decide, and the decision is recorded.
    AI literacy (Art. 4)Each record shows who uses the tool, so measures are assigned by role and use, as tasks with owners, and the evidence is kept.
    TransparencyTasks with owners, evidence and review reminders.
    Proving it to management, the DPO or the authorityAn always up-to-date report with decisions, measures and next reviews.

    Sources

    1. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 on artificial intelligence (EUR-Lex)
    2. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Digital Omnibus on AI (OJ, 24 July 2026)
    3. Future of Privacy Forum: the AI Act timeline after the Omnibus
    4. ActuIA: obligations in force and delays under Omnibus 2026/1744
    5. Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/2274, the AI Act's first harmonised standard: EN 18286 (EUR-Lex)
    6. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (PDF): new Art. 4 and recital 8
    7. European Commission: AI literacy questions and answers
    8. Regulation (EU) 2016/679, GDPR (Art. 39)
    9. Osborne Clarke: key points of the Spanish draft organic law (in Spanish)
    10. Congress of Deputies: record of draft law 121/000096 (in Spanish)
    11. El Derecho: dissolution of the Cortes, Royal Decree 806/2026 (in Spanish)

    General information, updated 30 October 2026. Not legal advice.