In force since 2 Feb 2025
Emotion recognition in educational institutions is prohibited
Systems that infer the emotions of students or staff in educational institutions are a prohibited practice (Art. 5), except for medical or safety reasons.
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 · as amended by (EU) 2026/1744
The EU AI Act applies in phases. Part of it already applies, and the most demanding part, high risk, arrives on 2 December 2027 after the delay introduced by the Digital Omnibus.
— days until the high-risk rules
Timeline
Each date's status is worked out from today's date on your device.
Education
In force since 2 Feb 2025
Systems that infer the emotions of students or staff in educational institutions are a prohibited practice (Art. 5), except for medical or safety reasons.
In force since 2 Feb 2025
Anyone using AI must take measures to support the AI literacy of their staff (Art. 4). Since the Omnibus, a specific level does not have to be guaranteed, but you do need to be able to show what you have done.
In force since 2 Aug 2026
People must be told when they are talking to an AI, for example a chatbot for families, and generated or manipulated content that is published must be labelled (Art. 50).
Technical marking of that content is the tool provider's obligation, not the institution's. Tools already on the market before 2 August 2026 have until 2 December 2026: it is worth asking the provider to confirm it.
From 2 Dec 2027
It covers education and vocational training at every level: schools, vocational colleges and universities. High-risk AI is AI used for:
Those using them will have to follow the provider's instructions, assign competent human oversight, monitor how they work, keep logs and inform the people affected (Art. 26). A private body providing a public service may also have to assess the impact on fundamental rights (Art. 27).
Companies
From 2 Dec 2027
Using AI to select or filter candidates, decide promotions or dismissals, allocate tasks or evaluate performance is high-risk. Staff must be informed before it is used.
From 2 Dec 2027
Assessing people's creditworthiness or pricing life and health insurance is also high-risk, except for fraud detection.
Training · Art. 4
The AI Act's only general training duty is AI literacy. It does not prescribe a course, a number of hours or a certificate: it asks for proportionate measures and the ability to show them.
“Providers and deployers of AI systems shall take measures to support the development of AI literacy of their staff and other persons dealing with the operation and use of AI systems on their behalf, taking into account their technical knowledge, experience, education and training and the context the AI systems are to be used in, and considering the persons or groups of persons on whom the AI systems are to be used. This obligation does not require providers or deployers to guarantee any specific level of AI literacy of any individual.”
Art. 4(1) · as worded by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, in force since 27 Jul 2026
In force since 2 Feb 2025
Every organisation that uses AI in a professional capacity, with no exemption by size. It covers staff and anyone using AI on the organisation's behalf, such as contractors or partners.
Measures are tailored to what each person already knows, how they use AI and who it is used on. In schools and vocational colleges, that includes students under 18.
What it does not require
Commission guidance
Asking staff to read the instructions for use is usually not enough.
Supervised since 2 Aug 2026
National market surveillance authorities have supervised Art. 4 since August 2026. It is worth recording which measure was taken, for whom, when and for which tool.
Art. 4 has no fine of its own in the AI Act. Penalties depend on each Member State, and in Spain the law that was to set them has lapsed (see below).
From 2 Dec 2027
Anyone using a high-risk system, for example to assess students, must assign human oversight to people with the necessary competence, training and authority (Art. 26(2)). Here the point is to prepare specific people for that system.
Data protection
The GDPR does not require an AI course, but the data protection officer's tasks include awareness-raising and training of staff involved in processing (Art. 39(1)(b)). When an AI tool processes student data, the two kinds of training overlap.
Practical guide for educational institutions, with a record template
ALEROM AI does not certify compliance with Art. 4: that responsibility stays with each organisation. It helps you know who uses each tool, assign each role the training it needs as a task with an owner, and keep the evidence. Coming soon, ALEROM AI will also offer the training: video tutorials by role. See the training.
Penalties
Prohibited practices.
Breaching other obligations, such as high-risk or transparency rules.
Giving incorrect or misleading information to the authorities.
Whichever is higher of the amount and the percentage of worldwide turnover applies; for SMEs, start-ups and small mid-caps, whichever is lower (Art. 99).
Spain
The draft Organic Law on the good use and governance of artificial intelligence (121/000096), approved by the Council of Ministers on 26 May 2026, lapsed on 6 October 2026 when the Cortes were dissolved. The general election is on 29 November 2026 and the new chambers convene on 23 December 2026: the next government will have to table it again.
The draft designated surveillance authorities, with AESIA as the single point of contact, and set the Spanish penalty regime. Until there is a law, the EU AI Act still applies directly, on its own timeline.
With ALEROM AI
| What the AI Act requires | What ALEROM AI does |
|---|---|
| Knowing what AI is used and why | An inventory of AI tools and uses, with a record of provider, data and terms. |
| Avoiding prohibited practices | A rule that flags as a priority any use that tries to detect emotions at school or at work. |
| Identifying high risk | Each use classified with readable rules, with Annex III uses flagged. |
| Human oversight | Sensitive uses reach a responsible person ready to decide, and the decision is recorded. |
| AI literacy (Art. 4) | Each record shows who uses the tool, so measures are assigned by role and use, as tasks with owners, and the evidence is kept. |
| Transparency | Tasks with owners, evidence and review reminders. |
| Proving it to management, the DPO or the authority | An always up-to-date report with decisions, measures and next reviews. |
Sources
General information, updated 30 October 2026. Not legal advice.